Finally cleaned my room, which unearthed my pastel collection.
Stopped cleaning to make this portrait.
Remembered how great it can feel to have rainbow-smudged fingertips.
Finally cleaned my room, which unearthed my pastel collection.
Stopped cleaning to make this portrait.
Remembered how great it can feel to have rainbow-smudged fingertips.

I have to preface my answer by saying that, as much as I had pictured being a mother, I never really pictured myself being pregnant. It’s not that carrying my own child wasn’t something I wanted to do, to the contrary; it’s just something I was unable to clearly envision. I, like many women, entertained a convincing paranoia that it wouldn’t work for me. A miracle of such enormity is already hard enough to compute; participating in any way is almost beyond the credit I could give myself, especially knowing perfectly qualified and worthy would-be parents who couldn’t get pregnant. If nature denied them, why would it be generous to me? Well it turns out, that part is random, or at least subject to an otherworldly logic I need not understand. I got lucky, so here I am.
OK, let’s get the things-that-are-just-how-I-expected out of the way, because they are kind of boring:
Now for what surprised me:
Long before being a candidate for parenthood, I enjoyed randomly asking people: “Pregnancy: miraculous or mundane?” I’d felt it was equally both things, but now, for me, its mundanity only contributes to its miracle. I suppose that’s one of the shifts that constitutes our transformation into gushing, lovesick parents. At least, that’s my assessment halfway through the process. Ask me again next trimester!
“The cosmos is also within us; we are made of starstuff. We are a way for the cosmos to know itself.”
Enjoy the sweet tunes of Carl Sagan, Richard Feynman, Neil deGrasse Tyson, and Bill Nye as remixed in”We Are All Connected”.
Two descendants of an Irish king journey to the island he once presided over — not to re-claim the land, but to conquer the waves.
Built into any of my posts (and most Tumblr posts, I’ve noticed) is a romantic affinity for the vagabond life. We are people who love to travel, and prefer to do it light. I’ve turned down enviable opportunities to settle into a cozy stability because stability comes at the cost of other things that carry more appeal for my ilk.
But I’ve never done this thoroughly. My voyaging waxes and wanes; it is braided with a desire to “accomplish” things that require staying on the grid: higher degrees, health insurance, long-term relationships. Others have taken their wanderlust farther, one of whom is the subject of this in-production documentary, my cousin Andrew Jacob. He’s a full-time amateur surfer and painter. He migrates according to the seasons, yet finds community wherever he goes. He’s a rare bird of our generation.
The film isn’t just about roadtripping and chasing waves, though. It’s about more than the mystique of simplistic societies and life on/as an island. It is also about where this drive toward new oceans comes from, and how it’s passed on. It’s about the consequences of ignoring it.
Watch the teaser for more, which starts after a few moments of the director and myself pleading for funding. If you want to support modern nomads, Irish culture, the surf community, independent artists, or if you simply want to watch the finished version of this film — please make a donation and/or share the video.
Thank you!
It’s very flattering you assume I have wisdom to share on this subject, as the challenge of “keeping the spark” is as old as couplehood. Here’s my take on it:
People tend to think that as time goes on, relationships go stale — they get boring, they cease to be challenging, they fall into ruts. I would argue that this unfairly portrays romance as deteriorative, when in fact as anything goes on it tends to become stale to us. We become less and less engaged, challenged, and prone to explore new paths with it. Is that a flaw of the constant in our lives, or of our treatment of it?
OK, so relationships may be extra at risk of seeming progressively dull because they involve (at least) two attention spans that are both inclined to dwindle. It’s not because we’re shallow; it’s because our brains try to be efficient by paying less attention to what registers as “familiar.” Hence minds (and eyes) wander, looking for new stimuli. And when they find it, we feel the rush of encountering someone who seems comparatively SO vivid, SO invigorating, SO sparkling with “spark”. Rinse and repeat.
That progression is typical of long-term relationship entropy, but things don’t have to go that way.
To cut to the chase: my theory on “keeping the spark” is to keep paying attention. But I must say, I don’t ever feel like I’m making an effort to sustain passion for my partner; I make an effort to sustain my passion for daily living, and in doing so, the passion for him sustains itself. This is an exercise in general Awareness, in seeing clearly. When you see a lover clearly, you see as you did in the beginning so it’s not hard to feel as you did in the beginning. But since it goes against all mental habits, it takes a lot of practice and that practice can take many forms: meditation, conscious touch, travel, alone time, and writing all hit the REFRESH button in my particular brain so its not clogged up with what I think I’ve already learned/observed/admired. For other people, what works may vary.
Conscientiousness must be a mutual commitment, of course, because in romance we want to feel seen as much as we want to feel enchanted by what we’re seeing. The impulse isn’t vain; it is natural, and must be satisfied for a substantial connection to be made. The trick, which I’m still tinkering with, is how to allow the merger of souls without incurring the merger of selves. Souls are supposed to open up and embrace each other, to fortify into shiny, heart-shaped, soul-on-soul pig pile action. But selves are meant to spring in their own unique directions, to chase and probe various versions of existence. We can fulfill both of these yearnings, even in long-term relationships, but rarely does that happen by accident.
And as for how I/we manage problems that arise, well, the perspective above doesn’t really consider problems to be problematic, more like another flavor of stimulation. True, that’s easy enough to say; when an issue comes up it sure can feel like a crisis. But the deeper we get into our relationship, the better we are at non-defensively noticing the real triggers and dealing with them before they mushroom into drama. With trust in good intentions, we’re safe enough to “be a mirror” for the other and to examine ourselves for underlying issues and reflexive behaviors.
I won’t lie, this requires a copious dosage of honesty and thus super-human amounts of humility and faith, and I don’t always have those on hand particularly when a wound is raw. When we first resolved to practice this lifestyle there was plenty of defensiveness and meltdowns to go around, but in time we proved to each other that we could talk about our flaws and blind spots without condemnation. And that’s when everything changed. Now, because of our investment in “brutal” honesty, not only does our bond feel indestructible, it has become indispensible. I have someone who doesn’t just adore me and make me laugh, think, and moan, but who will also call me out, talk me down from my delusions, and alert me when I’m hurting others even if by accident. That is someone I want in my life, forever. That is someone worth meeting again every day as if for the first time, so you better believe every day I do my damndest to make a good first impression.
Experimenting with creepy self-portraits using the panoramic feature on my new phone.
On the whole this is quite successful work:
your main argument about the poet’s ambivalence?
how he loves the very things he attacks?
is most persuasive and always engaging.
At the same time,
there are spots
where your thinking becomes, for me,
alarmingly opaque, and your syntax seems to jump
backwards through unnecessary hoops,
as on p. 2 where you speak of “precognitive awareness
not yet disestablished by the shell that encrusts
each thing that a person actually says”
or at the top of p. 5 where your discussion of
“subverbal undertow miming the subversion of self-belief
woven counter to desire’s outreach”
leaves me groping for firmer footholds.
(I’d have said it differently,
or rather, said something else.)
And when you say that women “could not fulfill themselves” (p.6)
“in that era” (only forty years ago, after all!)
are you so sure that the situation is so different today?
Also, how does Whitman bluff his way into
your penultimate paragraph? He is the last poet
I would have quoted in this context!
What plausible way of behaving
does the passage you quote represent? Don’t you think
literature should ultimately reveal possiblities for action?
Please notice how I’ve repaired your use of semicolons.
And yet, despite what may seem my cranky response,
I do admire the freshness of
your thinking and your style; there is
a vitality here; your sentences thrust themselves forward
with a confidence as impressive as it is cheeky… .
You are not
me, finally,
and though this is an awkward problem, involving
the inescapable fact that you are so young, so young
it is also a delightful provocation.
A-
This Young Rival music video combines many of my favorite things: insane face paint, shape-shifting, lip synching, jungle creatures, stupidly simple Canadian indie rock… Et cetera.
Enjoy.
Those are some very curious correlations you’ve drawn! Any logic to them?
Me, I’m actually a registered Independent, which is annoying this time of year because pollsters buzz my apartment every day asking how I plan to vote. The answer of course is I plan to write-in the ghost of Louisa May Alcott.
I’m starting a new creative project and need your help to get it started!
Please use the title link (as often as you want) to submit questions about (a work of) literature, matters of philosophy/political science, academic issues, etc., for an expert on the appropriate subject to address. If you have your own site or an academic affiliation you want to share, feel free to include that info — but the invite is open to anyone.
Responses will be published elsewhere along with the questions, but not any time super soon; I will link to them as they go up. The premise depends on interactivity, so ask away! And thanks.
Details to follow. :D